WILD NEW JERSEY: N.J.com: New Jersey open space advocates push for $600M to preserve land
N.J.com: New Jersey open space advocates push for $600M to preserve land
If voters authorized it, a proposed $600 million bond issue this fall can be used to acquire land for preservation. Photo credit: The Star Ledger/Jerry Mccrea.
6/8/2009 5:27 PM
John Krippalani wrote:
I really find that all these articles tickle my fancy! I look forward to reading them and become inspired! The environment is like rock n' roll...it's here to stay, baby! I'm curious to know if the EWA will purchase any wildlife sanctuary like the Chippewa's and turn it into an Indian Casino. That would be boss.. Then with the revenue from the gamblers, parking , concessions et al. there would be a whole lotta coin to throw back into the environment...especially Rahway, that place needs a good Spring cleaning. What it is is the fact that the Casino's usually don't care about the environment andset the limits at their Blackjack tables so high the commoner can't play!!You just have to meander about and hope to get a free drink or two... Henceforth, the EWA needs it's own Casino and luxury hotel to match. thanks for listening. Reply to this
I really find that all these articles tickle my fancy! I look forward to reading them and become inspired! The environment is like rock n' roll...it's here to stay, baby! I'm curious to know if the EWA will purchase any wildlife sanctuary like the Chippewa's and turn it into an Indian Casino. That would be boss.. Then with the revenue from the gamblers, parking , concessions et al. there would be a whole lotta coin to throw back into the environment...especially Rahway, that place needs a good Spring cleaning. What it is is the fact that the Casino's usually don't care about the environment andset the limits at their Blackjack tables so high the commoner can't play!!You just have to meander about and hope to get a free drink or two... Henceforth, the EWA needs it's own Casino and luxury hotel to match. thanks for listening.
Reply to this